Tags

, , , ,

  1. Gather one’s thugs.
  2. Create (false flag) or take advantage of an incident that may be attributed to one’s chosen enemy.
  3. Repeat.
  4. Repeat.
  5. As often as necessary until the air is filled with “you people” accompanied by the denouncing and demonizing of the same.
  6. Form up and deploy additional gangs who have as their reason for being the mounting of “extremist” assaults.
  7. When the The Enemy has responded with gangs of its own and produced sufficiently brutal atrocities in the process of addressing the provocations designed for it, then by way of the world’s more gentle hearts and the melange of motivations bouncing around inside the UN, cry, complain, and whine about the awful things being done to one’s own.
  8. Finally, align one’s other assets — financial and political clout, defense purchasing power and related military — to draw the conflict (now created and burning well) toward one’s middle objectives.
  9. With the world’s change of heart, it’s love and sympathy — its essential buy-in — expand and relax.
  10. Job well done.  Prepare the next front.

I don’t know if it’s true, but some things seem to work along these lines.

I do believe in the idea of expanding incitement in conflict, i.e., start with a fairly healthy society and do it some damage of a type associated with discrimination.  Call that a dent and watch the dent become a hairline crack, a fissure, a fracture, a great rending of the social fabric, and continue to play the conflict — after all: you started it, it’s your game — until it comes to you for a moderated peace beneath the understanding aegis of your own capacious robes.

# # #