Tags
Birmingham, Great Britain, Islam, Islamic subversion, nepotism, radicalism, radicalization process
On the subject of the hardline takeover of Birmingham schools, I think The Guardian may be Britain’s most dishonest newspaper.
Now I’m curious about the merely less dishonest newspapers!
🙂
However the scribblers spill ink or etch their brilliance into long-term optical-magnetic storage, the British jotters appear to be picking up on the latest in the conflict between the truth and political correctness.
Hardline Muslim governors led an ‘organised campaign’ to change the character of ordinary state schools, the Education Secretary Michael Gove told MPs in a fiery Commons statement this afternoon.
Her Majesty’s Inspectors carried out inspections of 21 schools in Birmingham between 5 March 2014 and 1 May 2014. All of the schools that were inspected are publicly funded and none is a faith school.
The inspectors found evidence that governors of some schools had exerted ‘inappropriate influence’ on the day to day running of schools — including narrowing of the curriculum, manipulating staff appointments and misuse of school funds. The makeup of some governing bodies has changed ‘markedly’ over recently years, leaving the schools vulnerable to ‘influence by unsuitable governors’.
In particular, some of the academies were judged by Ofsted to be breach of their funding agreements — including not having ‘broad and balanced’ curriculums, a ‘balance in religious education’ or fulfilling a ‘general requirement to promote community cohesion’.
That last excerpt includes a four-minute-and-forty-second address by Sir Michael Wilshaw, the Ofsted organization’s chief inspector. Less than two minutes along, he says, ” . . . there has been a sudden and distinct decline in these schools . . . .’
A Muslim school found to have books suggesting stoning and lashing as appropriate punishments says it is the victim of “hostility”.
BBC. “Books ‘promoting storning’ found at Olive Tree Primary School.” June 9, 2014.
# # #
