Many mainstream Muslim organizations have gone so far as to say the Islamic State is, in fact, un-Islamic. It is, of course, reassuring to know that the vast majority of Muslims have zero interest in replacing Hollywood movies with public executions as evening entertainment. But Muslims who call the Islamic State un-Islamic are typically, as the Princeton scholar Bernard Haykel, the leading expert on the group’s theology, told me, “embarrassed and politically correct, with a cotton-candy view of their own religion” that neglects “what their religion has historically and legally required.” Many denials of the Islamic State’s religious nature, he said, are rooted in an “interfaith-Christian-nonsense tradition.”

http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/02/what-isis-really-wants/384980/ – March 2015.


While writer Graeme Wood disproves his own intent as regards ISIS not being a psychotic phenomenon in the above thorough exploration of the cult and its deeply archaic reasoning about its own “methodology”, he also hits all of the keys as regards the broad front of a revanchist Islam.


Related:

http://www.defenseone.com/politics/2015/02/why-obama-wont-talk-about-islamic-terrorism/105390/ – 2/16/2015.

# # #