Tags
Communist Party Integrity, Jacob Zuma, kleptocracy, malignant narcissism, Moral capital, rejection of state corruption, South Africa
—
—
His family has been looting, his friends have been looting, and in the process he has weakened the state, divided the ANC, divided the alliance. We continue to deal with the mess, and it will take a long time to clean up.” —
One dictatorship can undo many of the gains made by ethical and modern revolutionaries. A nod here to the South Africans letting Jacob Zuma know he has gone off the track.
Zuma, not unlike Robert Mugabe, may also represent an execrable representation of the claim to leading a “people’s liberation movement” as a means to autocratic and elitist power. This time, however, the communist alignment has turned on the leader over the matter of corruption.
http://www.peoplesworld.org/article/south-african-communists-ban-president-zuma-from-party-congress/
“We never fought the struggle to liberate the country to hand over our economy to the Guptas,” he declared, accusing the ANC leadership’s attacks on “white monopoly capital” of being “a Marxist-flavored narrative [used] as an alibi for parasitic plundering.”
Amen.
Inspiration: Mandela on the promotion of national reconciliation.
Lesson to be learned: if you should happen to develop or inherit high ethical and moral capital and standing, don’t squander it with a now old and tiresome charade.
–33–
Pingback: FTAC: A Comment on South Africa’s Feudal v Modern Dilemma | BackChannels
Pingback: FTAC: A Note for the Self-Sabotaging Left | BackChannels