globalism, International Organizations, medieval v modern, One Earth, Organizing Earth, political power
Who here speaks Orwellian?
In one short bash at the keyboard, this, “anti-globalists”, is what “globalization” looks like and, for the most part (the Valdai Discussion Club may be an exception, but it is what Russia offers at this time), with focus on democracy, freedom, and justice in opposition to authoritarianism and the capricious, exploiting, and venal pursuit of power.
Alliance for Securing Democracy
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Institute for Multi-Track Diplomacy
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
International Civil Aviation Organization
International Code Council (Building Standards)
International Committee of the Red Cross
International Labour Organization
International Olympic Committee
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe
Pacific Council on International Policy
United Nations Security Council
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom
World Intellectual Property Organization
Oppenheim’s International Law: United Nation’s 1st Edition
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982
In place of fear about “globalist ambitions” (is someone summoning anti-Semitic tropes back to life?), I would suggest a change of axis toward feudal absolute and modern democratic systems of economic, political, and social organization. Modern and visionary outlooks needs must be global while remaining careful of the cultural, ecological, ethnic, racial, and religious diversity extant on our one “pale blue dot” of a planet.
Pingback: George Soros: Anti-Authoritarian; Pro-Democratic! | BackChannels
Pingback: Fascionable Politics | BackChannels
Pingback: FTAC: On the Secular Roof: No Compulsion | BackChannels